
As the author of the book, Amazing Evidence For God: How To Experience The Power And Presence Of God.
I had considered including a chapter in my book about the many scientists around the world, who believe scientific evidence supports the creation of all that is seen and unseen within six 24-hour days, just as God revealed to humankind in the Holy Bible.
But instead, I would like to recommend an excellent book edited by John F Ashton PhD, and each of the fifty chapters of the book written by a PhD scientist.
Important questions about the Big Bang Theory, radioactive dating of rocks, light from distant stars, and the fossil evidence for evolution are discussed in detail.
These essays examine the entire approach to science education, and are essential reading for educators, politicians, parents and students.
For more information, take a look on Amazon.co.uk end enter the title of the book –
In Six Days, Why 50 Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation.

During recent decades, new scientific evidence from many scientific disciplines such as cosmology, physics, biology, “artificial intelligence” research, and others have caused scientists to begin questioning Darwinism’s central tenet of natural selection and studying the evidence supporting it in greater detail.
Yet public TV programs, educational policy statements, and science textbooks have asserted that Darwin’s theory of evolution fully explains the complexity of living things. The public has been assured that all known evidence supports Darwinism and that virtually every scientist in the world believes the theory to be true.
The scientists on this list dispute the first claim and stand as living testimony in contradiction to the second. Since Discovery Institute launched this list in 2001, more than a thousand scientists have courageously stepped forward to sign their names.
The list is growing and includes scientists from the US National Academy of Sciences, Russian, Hungarian and Czech National Academies, as well as from universities such as Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT, UC Berkeley, UCLA, and others.
A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism
We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.
There is scientific dissent from Darwinism. It deserves to be heard.
https://dissentfromdarwin.org/
Here is the 2005 list of 1000 Scientists who dissent from Darwinism, listed by Doctoral degree or current position. Click on the FREE DOWNLOAD (below) to view the PDF list.
Scientific-Dissent-List-07302025 (pdf)
Download